skip to primary navigation skip to content

CBSU bibliography search

To request a reprint of a CBSU publication, please click here to send us an email (reprints may not be available for all publications)

The ecological validity of tests of executive function.
Burgess, P.W., Alderman, N., Evans, J., Emslie, H., & WILSON, B.A.
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4, 547- 558.
Year of publication:
CBU number:
Ninety-two mixed etiology neurological patients and 216 control participants were assessed on a range of neuropsychological tests, including 10 neuropsychological measures of executive function derived from 6 different tests. People who knew the patients well (relatives or carers) completed a questionnaire about the patient’s dysexecutive problems in everyday life, and this paper reports the extent to which the tests predicted the patients’ everyday life problems. All of the tests were significantly predictive of at least some of the behavioural and cognitive deficits reported by patients’ carers. However, factor analysis of the patients’ dysexecutive symptoms suggested a fractionation of the dysexecutive syndrome, with neuropsychological tests loading differentially on 3 underlying cognitive factors (Inhibition, Intentionality, and Executive Memory), supporting the conclusions that different tests measure different cognitive processes, and that there may be limits to the fractionation of the executive system.