Authors:

VAINRE, M., DALGLEISH, T., WATSON, P., Haag, C., Dercon, Q., Galante, J., Hitchcock, C.

Reference:

Year of publication:

2024

CBU number:

8968

Abstract:

Background Mindfulness-based programmes (MBPs) are increasingly offered at work, often in online self- guided format. However, the evidence on MBPs’ effect on work performance (WP) is inconsistent. Objective This pragmatic randomised controlled feasibility trial assessed procedural uncertainties, intervention acceptability and preliminary effect sizes of a MBP on WP, relative to an alternative intervention. Methods 241 employees from 8 employers were randomised (1:1) to complete a four-week, self- guided, online MBP or a light physical exercise programme (active control). Feasibility and acceptability measures were of primary interest. WP at post-intervention (PostInt) was the primary outcome for preliminary assessment of effect sizes. Secondary outcomes assessed mental health (MH) and cognitive processes hypothesised to be targeted by the MBP. Outcomes were collected at baseline, PostInt, and 12-week follow-up (12wFUP). Prospective trial protocol: NCT04631302. Findings 87% of randomised participants started the course. Courses had high acceptability. Retention rates were typical for online trials (64% PostInt; 30% 12wFUP). MBP, compared to the control, offered negligible benefits for WP (PostInt (d=0.06, 95% CI -0.19-0.32);12wFUP (d=0.02, 95% CI -0.30-0.26)). Both interventions improved MH outcomes (ds=-0.40-0.58, 95% CIs -0.32- 0.18); between-group differences were small (ds=-0.09-0.04, 95% CIs -0.15-0.17). Conclusion The trial is feasible; interventions are acceptable. Results provide little support for a later- phase trial comparing an MBP to a light exercise control. To inform future trials, we summarise procedural challenges. Clinical implications Results suggest MBPs are unlikely to improve WP relative to light physical exercise. Although the MBP improved MH, other active interventions may be just as efficacious

URL: