Skip navigation

You are in:  Home » Bibliography

CBU bibliography

Go to searchable bibliography index

Is remembering emotional information an involuntary/unconscious process or is it related to voluntary conscious retrieval?

CBU number: 7025
Authors: RAMPONI, C. Handelsman, G. & BARNARD, P.J.
Reference: Meeting of the Experimental Psychology Society, 2nd - 4th of April 2008
Year of publication: 2008
Abstract text: Memory for emotional material (events, pictures and words) has been shown to be superior than memory for neutral material in explicit memory tests of recall and recognition. If the memory advantage for emotional stimuli is an automatic, involuntary/unconscious process, this effect should be present in tests of implicit memory. We compared results from two tests of memory identical in all respects apart from retrieval instructions. After studying emotional and neutral paired associates, participants were shown the first member of the pair; intentional retrieval participants were instructed to explicitly recall the associated word, whilst incidental retrieval participants were instructed to generate the first word that came to mind associated to the word. Depth of study processing had an effect on the intentional test, but not the incidental test, showing a dissociation that confirmed the incidental test was not contaminated by an intentional retrieval strategy. In the intentional test emotional pairs were better recalled than neutral pairs, but this was not found in the incidental test. The absence of an emotion effect on implicit memory, strongly suggests that emotional material devoid of its contextual episode has not a preferential mnemonic status; voluntary/conscious remembering is required for observing a memory advantage for emotional material.
First CBU author: RAMPONI, C
Annual report number: CBUAR 54
Keywords: Conference Proceedings and Published Abstracts, Poster

Request a reprint

The Reprint Request service is currently unavailable. The webform interface is not passing on your requests despite saying it has.

PDF's of articles are also not available unless specifically linked from the record under the link field. Open Access papers are accessible this way when available. We are not able to fulfill pdf requests due to copyright and contractual restrictions.

Inclusion in the Bibliography does not mean that a copy is available, this is foremost a record of the unit's work. Papers marked 'In Press' have not been published so are not available. Books and tests are also not available for copying. These are commerical products and you will need to buy them, or indeed contact your local library service to get a copy.

If a record is from a conference and does not show more than one page number then the record/abstract on the page is the complete record. These are mainly a record of participation in a conference, such as a poster or a talk. Some of these records represent literally nothing more than a line.

Subject: * Request for offprint of publication 7025
Message: *
Your name: *
E-mail address: *
Postal address: *

* Items marked with an asterisk [*] are required fields and must be fully completed.