CBSU bibliography search
To request a reprint of a CBSU publication, please
click here to send us an email (reprints may not be available for all publications)
New evidence for morphological errors in deep dyslexia
Authors:
Rastle, K., Tyler, L.K. & MARSLEN-WILSON, W.D.
Reference:
Brain and Language 97(2), 189-199
Year of publication:
2006
CBU number:
6254
Abstract:
Morphological errors in reading aloud (e.g, sexist - sexy) are a central feature of the symptom-complex known as deep dyslexia, and have historically been viewed as evidence that representations at some level of the reading system are morphologically structured. However, it has been proposed 9Funnell, 1987) that morphological errors in deep dyslexia are not morphological in nature but are actually a type of visual error that arises when a target word that cannot be read aloud (by virtue of its low imageability and/or frequency) is modified to form a visually similar word that can be read aloud (by virtue of its higher imageability and/or frequency). In the work reported here, the deep dyslexic patient DE read aloud lists of genuinely suffixed words (e.g., killer), pseudosuffixed words (eg., corner), and words with non-morphological embeddings (e.g., cornea). Results revealed that the morphological status of a word had a significant influence on the production of stem errors (i.e. errors that include the stem or pseudostem of the target): genuinely suffixed words yielded more stem errors that pseudosuffixed words or words with non-morphological embeddings. This effect of morphological status could not be attributed to the relative levels of target and stem imageability and/or frequency. We argue that this pattern of data indicates that apparent morphological errors in deep dyslexic reading are genuinely morphological, and discus the implications of these errors for theories of deep dyslexia.
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit

