Skip navigation

You are in:  Home » Bibliography

CBU bibliography

Go to searchable bibliography index

Reducing specificity of autobiographical memory in non-clinical participants: the role of rumination and schematic models

CBU number: 6111
Authors: BARNARD, P.J., Watkins, E.R. & RAMPONI, C.
Reference: Cognition & Emotion, 20(3/4), 328-350
Year of publication: 2006
Abstract text: Two experiments are reported in which non-dysphoric participants, not prone to excessive levels of rumination in everyday life, were asked to retrieve autobiographical memories using the Williams & Broadbent (1986) procedure (AMT). In the first experiment, two variants of a self-related category fluency task were interleaved among sets of autobiographical memory cues. In one variant (blocked) a normal model of analytic rumination was induced by grouping prompts on a single superordinate theme together. In the other (intermixed) prompts from several different themes were grouped together. It was predicted that the blocked variant would reduce the number of specific memories recollected and increase the number of categoric memories relative to the intermixed variant. This prediction was confirmed and provides the first demonstration of a bidirectional causal influence of analytic rumination on the balance between specific and categoric retrievals. A second experiment showed no alteration in this balance when the same fluency manipulation involved animal related categories rather than self-related ones. The results support a two component model of autobiographical retrieval being driven in part by the extent to which an analytic mode of processing is adopted in the short term and in part by the level of differentiation in self-related schematic models.
First CBU author: Barnard, P.J.
Annual report number: CBUAR 50
Keywords: Autobiographical Memory, Rumination, Self Models, Interacting Cognitive Subsystems

Request a reprint

The Reprint Request service is currently unavailable. The webform interface is not passing on your requests despite saying it has.

PDF's of articles are also not available unless specifically linked from the record under the link field. Open Access papers are accessible this way when available. We are not able to fulfill pdf requests due to copyright and contractual restrictions.

Inclusion in the Bibliography does not mean that a copy is available, this is foremost a record of the unit's work. Papers marked 'In Press' have not been published so are not available. Books and tests are also not available for copying. These are commerical products and you will need to buy them, or indeed contact your local library service to get a copy.

If a record is from a conference and does not show more than one page number then the record/abstract on the page is the complete record. These are mainly a record of participation in a conference, such as a poster or a talk. Some of these records represent literally nothing more than a line.

Subject: * Request for offprint of publication 6111
Message: *
Your name: *
E-mail address: *
Postal address: *

* Items marked with an asterisk [*] are required fields and must be fully completed.