skip to primary navigation skip to content

CBSU bibliography search


To request a reprint of a CBSU publication, please click here to send us an email (reprints may not be available for all publications)

Assessment of neuropsychological function in brain tumour treatment: A comparison of traditional neuropsychological assessment with app-based cognitive screening
Authors:
Romero-Garcia, R., Owen, M., McDonald, A., Woodberry, E., ASSEM, M., Coelho, P., Morris, R.C., Price, S.J., Santarius, T., Suckling, J., MANLY, T., EREZ, Y., Hart, M.G.
Reference:
ACTA Neurochirurgica
Year of publication:
In Press
CBU number:
8794
Abstract:
Background Gliomas are typically considered to cause relatively few neurological impairments. However, cognitive difficulties can arise, for example during treatment, with potential detrimental effects on quality of life. Accurate, reproducible, and accessible cognitive assessment is therefore vital in understanding the effects of both tumour and treatments. Our aim is to compare traditional neuropsychological assessment with an app-based cognitive screening tool in patients with glioma before and after surgical resection. Our hypotheses were that cognitive impairments would be apparent, even in a young and high functioning cohort, and that app-based cognitive screening would complement traditional neuropsychological assessment. Methods Seventeen patients with diffuse gliomas completed a traditional neuropsychological assessment and an app-based touchscreen tablet assessment (OCS-BRIDGE) pre- and post-operatively. The app assessment was also conducted at 3- and 12-month follow-up. Impairment rates, mean performance, and pre- and post-operative changes were compared using standardized Z-scores. Results Approximately 2-3 hours of traditional assessment indicated an average of 2.88 cognitive impairments per patient, whilst the 30-minute screen indicated 1.18. As might be expected, traditional assessment using multiple items across the difficulty range proved more sensitive than brief screening measures in areas such as memory and attention. However, the capacity of the screening app to capture reaction times enhanced its sensitivity, relative to traditional assessment, in the area of non-verbal function. Where there was overlap between the two assessments, for example digit span tasks, the results were broadly equivalent. Conclusions Cognitive impairments were common in this sample and app-based screening complemented traditional neuropsychological assessment. Implications for clinical assessment and follow-up are discussed.


genesis();