Skip navigation

You are in:  Home » Bibliography

CBU bibliography

Go to searchable bibliography index

When does thought equal action? The unusual case of (probable) persistent vegetative state

CBU number: 5710
Authors: OWEN, A.M.
Reference: in W. Printz and N. Sebanz (Eds). Disorders of Volition
Year of publication: 2006
Abstract text: The idea that the frontal cortex is important for intended actions is not a new one, although the precise nature of this involvement has been neither behaviourally, nor anatomically, well specified. As early as 1922, Bianchi (Bianchi, 1922) suggested that the frontal lobes are involved in controlling behaviour, while the neuropsychological literature throughout the last century is filled with descriptions of frontal-lobe patients that imply an impairment of intended actions, but lack testable, well-specified components. For example, terms such as ‘planning’ (Owen et al., 1990; Shallice, 1982, 1988), ‘temporal structuring of behaviour’ (Fuster, 1997) ‘monitoring or manipulation in working memory’ (Owen, 1997; Petrides, 1994) and the ‘control of behaviour by context’ (Cohen and Servan-Schreiber, 1992), have often been used to describe the behaviour of these patients. In this chapter, I will review recent evidence that suggests that the mid-ventrolateral region of the frontal cortex, which in humans lies below the inferior frontal sulcus, is important for intended action; that is, any behaviour (e.g. an action or a thought), that is consciously willed by the agent responsible for carrying out that behaviour. Data from both neuropsychological investigations in patients and functional neuroimaging studies in healthy volunteers will be discussed, as well as relevant evidence from lesion and electrophysiological studies in the macaque CHAPTER CHANGED IN CONTENT, REWRITTEN AS CBU 5849 This is not a valid reference but kept in due to it being reported in HPR 48.
Annual report number: CBUAR 48
Keywords: Book Chapter

Request a reprint

The Reprint Request service is currently unavailable. The webform interface is not passing on your requests despite saying it has.

PDF's of articles are also not available unless specifically linked from the record under the link field. Open Access papers are accessible this way when available. We are not able to fulfill pdf requests due to copyright and contractual restrictions.

Inclusion in the Bibliography does not mean that a copy is available, this is foremost a record of the unit's work. Papers marked 'In Press' have not been published so are not available. Books and tests are also not available for copying. These are commerical products and you will need to buy them, or indeed contact your local library service to get a copy.

If a record is from a conference and does not show more than one page number then the record/abstract on the page is the complete record. These are mainly a record of participation in a conference, such as a poster or a talk. Some of these records represent literally nothing more than a line.

Subject: * Request for offprint of publication 5710
Message: *
Your name: *
E-mail address: *
Postal address: *

* Items marked with an asterisk [*] are required fields and must be fully completed.