skip to primary navigation skip to content

CBSU bibliography search

To request a reprint of a CBSU publication, please click here to send us an email (reprints may not be available for all publications)

Objects and attributes in divided attention: Surface and boundary systems
Duncan, J. & Nimmo-Smith, I.
Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 1076-1084
Year of publication:
CBU number:
A series of experiments investigated the finding that the fundamental frequency (F0) discrimination of a group of unresolved harmonics is impaired more by a masker which starts before and ends after it than by one which is gated on and off synchronously with it [Carlyon, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., submitted]. Except where otherwise stated, the masker was a group of unresolved harmonics with an F0 of 210 Hz, the target F0s were geometrically centered on 210 Hz, both the targets and the masker were filtered between 3900 and 5400 Hz, and the target duration was 200 ms. The additional deterioration produced by the portion of the masker occurring before the target (the "forward fringe") was greater than that produced by the portion after the target ("backward fringe"), but both had some effect. The forward and backward fringes reduced sensitivity even when the portion of the masker synchronous with the targets was absent, although the reduction was greatest when it was present. The deterioration was markedly reduced by filtering the fringes into a frequency region remote from the target and the synchronous portion of the masker, by attenuating the fringes by 10 dB, or by presenting them either contralaterally to the target or diotically. It could not be reduced by allowing the F0 of the fringes and of the synchronous portion of the masker to differ greatly from that of the target, or by adding a low-frequency portion to the fringe, thereby providing an additional cue to the time of transition between fringe and target. Explanations based on peripheral adaptation and on seemingly similar effects previously observed with brief targets [Kelly and Watson, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79, 1934-1938 (1986); Massaro, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 58, 1059-1065 (1975)] were rejected. The data are discussed in terms of a central mechanism which includes parts of the fringes in its estimate of the pitch of the target/masker mixture.